4 ms·
Kodak was a chemical company, not a camera company. Stop using this analogy.
by pbj1968 4y ago
Kodak was a chemical company, not a camera company. Stop using this analogy.
- kalleboo 4y agoSo was Fujifilm and they still exist and have a successful line of digital cameras
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- djmips 4y agoAnd Xerox was a photocopy company and not a computer company right? /s
- ulfw 4y agoNokia was a paper mill company. Not sure what you're trying to say.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- zw123456 4y agoThe point is, Ma Bell, the original AT&T, was a long distance company. That was their cash cow. That was their mind set. So the basically gave cellular away. Same thing as Kodak, they saw themselves as a chemical company not a photography company. Truth is, ma bell should have thought of themselves as a telecommunications compay. Exact same mistake.