4 ms·
I thought they were trying to measure the passing time, not checking for danger. I don’t think there’s any doubt in their minds that there is danger.
by luxuryballs 4y ago
I thought they were trying to measure the passing time, not checking for danger. I don’t think there’s any doubt in their minds that there is danger.
- lll-o-lll 4y ago“ We get people to swallow pill cameras all the time in our gastro department, and they're bigger than that. The numbers that we'd learned, although I'd learned as part of my pediatric training around what you will and won't pass and where the danger zones are, is that if something's greater than 110 millimeters, then it won't get around your duodenum. And if it's pointy and spiky, then there's a risk of it stabbing into stuff. The Lego heads were neither of those. We've kind of talked about that right at the point of designing the study because we talked about swallowing the classic two-by-four Lego brick, and then decided that that was going to be too pointy. Really, a Lego head is just like a piece of corn, isn't it?” So no, there’s no danger. Sure, the passing time was the premise but this was done for a) laughs and b) to spread awareness about swallowing batteries.
- luxuryballs 4y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diverticulitis https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diverticulitis
- lll-o-lll 4y agoNot sure what your point is in linking to this?
- kwhitefoot 4y agoThey are presumably trying to warn of the danger that a foreign indigestible body might get stuck in a pocket in the gut. But were too lazy to say so.