3 ms·
Again, the Supreme Court's role is not to cause or avoid social outcomes; it's to rule on the constitutionality of law. To suggest otherwise is confirming that
by nathanaldensr 4y ago
Again, the Supreme Court's role is not to cause or avoid social outcomes; it's to rule on the constitutionality of law. To suggest otherwise is confirming that you believe in an activist court--as long as it suits you, of course.
- PartiallyTyped 4y agoFair enough, let that be the purpose of the SC as envisioned by the founding fathers. Does the evidence suggest that the SC is filling that role and is not an activist court?