3 ms·
There are simple experiments you can perform to prove the correctness of Bernoulli’s principle. If the math cannot accurately describe completely what is happen
by rawgabbit 4y ago
There are simple experiments you can perform to prove the correctness of Bernoulli’s principle. If the math cannot accurately describe completely what is happening, then it is our math that is lacking. Technically the air is less dense on top which generates lift. And yes planes do fall from the sky when they stall due large angles of attack which disrupt the laminar flow.
- injb 4y agoBernoullis principle isn't necessary though because there are planes with symmetric wing sections that fly just fine, not to mention the fact that planes with conventional wing sections can fly upside down. The article should probably be called "Half of people can explain why planes stay in the air, but the other half doesn't know they're wrong".
- rawgabbit 4y agoCan you tell me the name of a commercial plane with a symmetric wing cross section?
- p_l 4y agoExtra 300 would be one example. Generally you use symmetric profiles for acrobatic planes - as all profiles have their own pros and cons, and symmetric ones increase capabilities in inverse flight (and acrobatics) while sacrificing low speed and straight flight performance.
- p_l 4y agoSymmetrical wings still use Bernoulli's principle.
- morpheos137 4y agoLess dense is the same as lower pressure above the wing than below. It seems we are arguing about semantics.
- rawgabbit 4y agoThere is a slight semantic difference. The poster suggested the plane compressed the air underneath. I believe he was trying to describe lift. Technically the plane is too small to compress the air. The plane’s wing does not compress the air it generates lift.
- morpheos137 4y agoI am sorry but I disagree. Air as a gas is a compressible fluid. You can compress air with your hand. I don't understand why this is hard to grasp. Basically it comes down to what is "lift." It is known winged planes can not fly in a vacuum. Rather planes fly by some sort of reaction force between air molecules and the wing. You seem to suggest the wing is pulled up from the top. How does that work? Do air molecules have little hooks that attach to the upper wing surface? Obviously no. So lift is just another name for the ordinary newtonian reaction force. It pushes from the bottom. How is that possible? It is possible because there are more air molecules colliding with the bottom of the wing than with the top. I.e. pressure is higher beneath than above. These collisions transfer kinetic energy from the compressed air to the wing.
- rawgabbit 4y agoYou cannot compress air with your hand. What you are doing is displacing it, moving it somewhere else. What you described It is possible because there are more air molecules colliding with the bottom of the wing than with the top. I.e. pressure is higher beneath than above. These collisions transfer kinetic energy from the compressed air to the wing. -- when I was in school a long long time ago -- we called it LIFT. We called it lift because at subsonic speeds, airplanes relied on Bernoulli's principle. At supersonic speeds, the shock wave created at the bow of the wing prevented laminar airflow meaning no LIFT. At supersonic speeds, the airplane flew due to the newtonian breakdown of airflow against the wing's undersurface. At supersonic speeds, airplanes are inherently unstable which meant they relied on computers to constantly correct their trajectory.