3 ms·
wow, would that have been 90/91? while at UK uni a few of us had a shell account at Netcom. we'd X25 from our uni to a telnet relay in london and used netcom fo
by ricktdotorg 4y ago
wow, would that have been 90/91? while at UK uni a few of us had a shell account at Netcom. we'd X25 from our uni to a telnet relay in london and used netcom for unix/shell access. we did not get reliably billed for a long time! thought at the time it was just UK/US banking issues. i wonder if Mitnick was why! will have to re-read the book. thanks for the memory!
- anonymousiam 4y agoNot sure if Kevin's Netcom escapades are responsible for you not getting billed for a shell account. I had two Netcom accounts (actually one account with two services). I was continuously billed ($19/mo?) for the shell account, but I was never billed ($6/hr) for the CSLIP account. Somewhere I read that Kevin had wiped the accounting records for CSLIP. I'm not sure of the level of detail described in his book. Maybe I'll read it again. I ran that CSLIP connection continuously for many years. I would have paid them if they had ever billed me.
- moremetadata 4y agoNatwests main security limitations was a few seconds to a dial up account in order to upload a batch file of bank accounts to transfer money around.