2 ms·
Kamala Harris used her relationship to obtain considerable power in a nakedly callous manner, it's a stark reality. Aside from the more vulgar elements, it's i
by jasmer 4y ago
Kamala Harris used her relationship to obtain considerable power in a nakedly callous manner, it's a stark reality.
Aside from the more vulgar elements, it's immoral and wold be illegal in most circumstances; it's just straight corruption.
To wit, those participating in these actions are Lawmakers and those responsible for the Justice System aka District Attorney, further embroiling the hypocrisy in the situation.
It's understandable people will feel uncomfortable with that reality, because it resonates with a kind of slander that is used to belittle people (especially women), hence my calling out the individual OP for making arbitrary insinuations.
But it's irresponsible to ignore such actions because it doesn't fit either one's political orientation, or triggers one's sensitivities.
What Harris did was bad. Arbitrarily insinuating women are only successful because they 'slept around' is also bad. It's actually not very nuanced at all once you start to think about it.
- yellowapple 4y ago> Kamala Harris used her relationship to obtain considerable power in a nakedly callous manner, it's a stark reality. [citation needed] > hence my calling out the individual OP for making arbitrary insinuations. Calling out someone for making arbitrary insinuations while yourself making arbitrary insinuations is blatantly hypocritical and - as you put it - "nakedly callous". Your comments boil down to "if the allegations are against a woman on my team then they're false but if they're against a woman on the other team then they're true". Maybe that ain't your intention, but that's how it reads. There was zero good-faith reason to bring up Kamala Harris apropos nothing - and in doing so (and in doubling down on doing so) you've obliterated your own argument.