3 ms·
I wonder what's with all the negative response… OK, Jmpress.js depends on jQuery and has narrower browser support than Impress.js. Yet it makes little sense to
by goblin89 15y ago
I wonder what's with all the negative response… OK, Jmpress.js depends on jQuery and has narrower browser support than Impress.js. Yet it makes little sense to compare a JavaScript presentation framework to ‘a jQuery plugin to build a website on the infinite canvas’. These are different things.
Perhaps the whole issue is with the naming and the fact that one was based on another's code.
- red545 15y agoI completely agree with you. I tried it yesterday it is completely simple to use. I definitely think that it is the right way to name it Jmpress.js, so he doesn't take any credit from the inventor.