4 ms·

I think both can be true. Have a look at the SuperGLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation) benchmark tasks to get a sense of of what these models will

by jt2190 4y ago

I think both can be true. Have a look at the SuperGLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation) benchmark tasks to get a sense of of what these models will have to conquer to reach human levels. Edit: I’m specifically responding to your assertion that the model has no constraints, which the post you’re replying to was talking about. > This task that the author had chatGPT do, literally shows that you don't actually need to figure it out it's "constraints". It's so unconstrained it can literally do a lot of what you ask it to. https://super.gluebenchmark.com/tasks https://super.gluebenchmark.com/tasks

idiotsecant 4y ago
Oh wow, this is fascinating. Thank you so much for the link. If you want a really interesting window into chatGPT's mind, start asking it to draw ASCII art. It definitely understands how to draw cats but it's intuition on the physical structure of other objects and how that is turned into line art is someone 'abstract'. I asked it to draw a fully loaded chicago style hotdog and it basically drew a approximately 12x grid of squares using pipes and repeated it for 7 or 8 screens. I started another session and asked the same and got approximately the same answer. I know it's anthropomorphizing but it's fascinating to look into an alien 'mind' even if there's nobody looking back at me.