4 ms·
Agreed. I'm afraid to say that UX/UI buzz is overrated, it's 99% copy 1% mix and match. And there's no revolutionary ideas. To be fair, something is truly hard
by Existenceblinks 4y ago
Agreed. I'm afraid to say that UX/UI buzz is overrated, it's 99% copy 1% mix and match. And there's no revolutionary ideas. To be fair, something is truly hard to the point I don't think there's a fix such as UI for tree data, it's all sucks given current 2d screen we have.
- jimmySixDOF 4y agoYes. The 2D WIMP is hard to argue with given the input/output constraints of keyboard video mouse. That physics was solved over generations (both human and tech) so research gains are limited. Enter NUI's - with LLMs just being one example, but all as a category maturing out of R&D labs into the real world possibility space, which includes XR (Augmented/Virtual/Mixed Reality) with Computer Vision understanding a full Six Degrees of Freedom world model. New UI/UX like these systems enable is very much an unsolved work in progress where early failures should be expected as painful as that may be.
- Existenceblinks 4y agoI think it's also bound to human sensing limitation. Generally speaking, UI seems to suffer from unable to present many things at a time. We have the concept of pagination, column, tab, collapsible thing, navigation just because many things can't be presented and comprehensible at the same time (I mean space)