The quibble I have with this article is that they suggest she was lazy in combining the layoff message with a positive company future performance message (speci

The quibble I have with this article is that they suggest she was lazy in combining the layoff message with a positive company future performance message (specifically, Serrano wrote, "As if she couldn’t do so in another email..."). Everyone in the company got the email. I can understand the desire to send the message, "this is a terrible thing for the people losing their jobs; we're trying to cushion the blow for them, but with this action we are set up for growth, so you don't need to worry that this is the first of several waves of layoffs". Maybe that should have been a separate note to the survivors. Maybe not. But this quibble about the article aside, the note is pretty bad.