3 ms·
> I feel like the hardest parts are getting participants to adhere to their assigned intervention, and preventing participants with a pre-existing agenda from j
by karpierz 4y ago
> I feel like the hardest parts are getting participants to adhere to their assigned intervention, and preventing participants with a pre-existing agenda from joining.
This combined with perverse incentives are why it's not possible. Non-experts with the resources to solve these problems are generally trying to sell you something, and aren't particularly interested in the truth.
- abeppu 4y agoPerhaps so. Saying it's "not possible" seems like an overly strong conclusion. For specific interventions, I think it might be possible to have open, blinded participation. E.g. for supplements which may affect memory: - Participants sign up to buy a supplement which they know will be one of k generally safe supplements or a placebo - The specific supplement or placebo they receive it thompson sampled (or similar) from our bandit given data so far, and sent to them unlabeled - They're only able to receive their next bottle if they complete weekly tests or measurements The value prop is that you're probably buying a pretty good intervention, even if you don't know which one it is (and perhaps you're getting a discount subsidized by the minority of people who are paying for a placebo at any given time). For a number of questions related to exercise, people may fall into camps about their prior beliefs, and may self-sabotage if they're in treatment group that goes against their preferences but there isn't a clear thing to sell. E.g. which of a family of training schedules helps people reduce their 10k running time the most?