3 ms·

Sure I think there are senses in which Tim Cook is accountable to customers, or maybe his own moral compass (as might be the case here), but in a specific and d

Sure I think there are senses in which Tim Cook is accountable to customers, or maybe his own moral compass (as might be the case here), but in a specific and direct sense the board that controls whether he keeps his job or not is legally bound to act for the shareholders. However I don't think Tim Cook in that moment was necessarily saying that accessibility was non-negotiable, shareholders be damned, it's also possible he was taking a broad view of shareholder interest that is about more than immediate ROI.

latexr 4y ago
> the board that controls whether he keeps his job or not A job he doesn’t need¹ and which he’s aware he’ll leave in the not-too-distant future.² The only thing stopping Cook from making different decisions is himself. ¹ He’s filthy rich. ² https://wccftech.com/tim-cook-not-running-apple-in-10-years-time/ https://wccftech.com/tim-cook-not-running-apple-in-10-years-...