> And something you can't easily classify as spam arguably isn't spam. [...] > I think the only way you're correct is if ChatGPT were to greatly increase the

> And something you can't easily classify as spam arguably isn't spam. [...] > I think the only way you're correct is if ChatGPT were to greatly increase the incentive to publish spam. Arguably it still is spam, and consider the incentive to hide advertising (or generally to push any agenda), when using a program is orders of magnitude cheaper than paying people to do it, but now is hard enough to recognize, I cannot say any more whether your average hn comment has been written by ChatGPT or not as long as I am not specifically looking out for it.