3 ms·
It's not just intention. It's, as some times dismissively put, "common sense". What price is an airline ticket on the first day of a global pandemic? No one kn
by mjburgess 4y ago
It's not just intention. It's, as some times dismissively put, "common sense".
What price is an airline ticket on the first day of a global pandemic? No one knows, and there isn't anything to provide a "procedural system" in order for it to model what our "intention" would be in those cases.
This seems obvious with a pandemic, but it is common place. Every day is a genuinely novel occurence, and counts only as a repetition of some superficial patterns in very very limited respects.
When this novelty becomes relevant to a problem can never, (obviously), be pre-stated because we don't yet know what that novelty is.
There is simply no substitute for being-in-the-world as animals are, that is: moving around, communicating, acting, reacting and participating. Growing, learning, reproducing, and problem-solving in direct causal contact with reality.
This isn't magic, but there is no "procedural model" of it; nor should we expect there to be. There aren't procedural models of almost any phenomenon.
What we can build a computer to do is "almost nothing", and we shouldnt expect the trivial problem space given by this to exhaust what we actually need machines to do.
- pixl97 4y agoI mean it seems there is some conflation between the human mind and human senses, and the computer mind and computer sensing going on here. You're stating that a large part of human behavior is reacting to the environment presented to them via sensory input/output mechanisms. What you have not stated is why a machine entity cannot do the same things?