2 ms·
It seems many people are dismissing this as report as complete junk science. They read the article, decided the conclusions are far-fetched. Imagine what 'sci
by linuxftw 4y ago
It seems many people are dismissing this as report as complete junk science. They read the article, decided the conclusions are far-fetched.
Imagine what 'scientists' can do for topics that aren't so easy to digest. If you question THAT science, why then you're just a conspiracy theorist.
- EEBio 4y agoNo, that’s usually not how it works. People usually get called a conspiracy theorist for making claims not based on (scientific) evidence. Often conspiracy theorists are not experts in the field and cannot distinguish between good and bad arguments (even though some conspiracy theorists have a uni degree in the field). Questioning a study does not a conspiracy theorist make, quality of of your arguments does.