So yes, that’s the legal proof of ownership… no one claimed to have written the song otherwise. But I thought you were interested in originality outside of jus

So yes, that’s the legal proof of ownership… no one claimed to have written the song otherwise. But I thought you were interested in originality outside of just the legal perspective? You know, that crimes can be committed without evidence and all? What makes Blowing in the Wind different from another folk song of the time? What makes them the same? Why are some non-original aspects allowed in a work considered original?