3 ms·
Good luck enforcing that. I mean that seriously - how would they tell?
by dymk 4y ago
Good luck enforcing that. I mean that seriously - how would they tell?
- whalee 4y agoThe arms race between generators and detectors has just begun.
- CGamesPlay 4y agoThe arms race was first automated in 2014, when the GAN paper was published. That's what GANs do: half the network generates garbage, the other half identifies if it was garbage or real. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661 https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661
- ad404b8a372f2b9 4y agoIt's only through careful configuration that the loss of the discriminator and of the generator are balanced to be able to improve gradually together. It's much easier for one loss to explode while the other goes to zero, breaking the training of the GAN. So the GAN training scheme is not a setting that holds for the real-life cat and mouse game of generated content detection. It's almost trivial to break a trained model whose weights you have.
- ClikeX 4y agoIt's essentially the extension of the arms race between writers and plagiarism detectors.
- iliane5 4y agoAI content detection is a losing battle imo. Models will become better and people will use the detectors to rephrase the text so it doesn’t get detected.