3 ms·
With you there, to a point. It's ironic and revealing that nobody actually consents to a social contract then. Closest most come is voting, and perhaps that im
by pmayrgundter 4y ago
With you there, to a point.
It's ironic and revealing that nobody actually consents to a social contract then. Closest most come is voting, and perhaps that implicitly validates the laws. But that's not really consent.
So maybe this consent assumption is not so strong!
- hnbad 4y agoOh, I agree that states aren't consensual in practice, neither is capitalism. That's why I'm an anarchist. But philosophically the justification for a state's existence is the mythical social contract and most modern states require some level of consent for contracts within their legal systems to be legitimate (e.g. can't be made under the legal definition of duress, which usually at least means a contract is invalid if the other party is literally holding a gun to your head).
- pmayrgundter 4y agocool