3 ms·
From @mx-psi > Speaking as a Collector contrib maintainer, I just wanted to say that I am not going to continue reviewing this PR or start reviewing other futu
by capableweb 4y ago
From @mx-psi
> Speaking as a Collector contrib maintainer, I just wanted to say that I am not going to continue reviewing this PR or start reviewing other future PRs related to the Datadog APM receiver to avoid any semblance of conflict of interest given my role both as a maintainer on this repository and as a member of Datadog's OpenTelemetry team.
And from their GitHub profile:
> Open Source Software Engineer at Datadog , focusing on OpenTelemetry
What's the conflict of interest exactly? You work at Datadog, supposedly to work on OSS, with a focus on OpenTelemetry and you don't want to review Datadog related code for OpenTelemetry? Sounds weird, that kind of profile is exactly the type of person who should be reviewing the code, they have knowledge of both sides of it.
Rather, it sounds like Datadog is walking back and don't want to support OpenTelemetry if it means it'll support their own tooling, instead of just others.
- judge2020 4y agoThe potential conflict is that people might think/perceive DD to still be out to harm this project given their previous request for the author to stop development. Anything that might be regular code review or discussion for "why did you choose this approach" could be seen as sabotage on this super public issue.