This comment highlights my problem with singular project tracking issues. Once they get so massive like this, people suddenly "can't follow along". Though not

This comment highlights my problem with singular project tracking issues. Once they get so massive like this, people suddenly "can't follow along". Though not specific to GitHub but in this case the ui hampers readability and the comments are very much in-the-moment. This then leaves me to ask the questions, (a) should we stop writing such mammoth comments in issues or (b) should we leverage generative AI to summarize a weekly or monthly timeline of issue interaction. What is the point of having historical issues if it's too complex to follow along? This was a question I regularly asked at GitHub that usually resulted in blank stares. GitHub's own answer to this is to force engineers to use a /slash command to post a summary of the week's updates. Clunky, but it works.