> Run it multiple times with multiple defendants, set up a control group And also > That would be a lot more work, but it would also be much higher quality da

> Run it multiple times with multiple defendants, set up a control group And also > That would be a lot more work, but it would also be much higher quality data I don’t know much about the field of law, but anecdotally it doesn’t strike me as particularly data driven. So I think, even before introducing any kind of AI, the above would be met with a healthy dose of gatekeeping. Like the whole sport of referencing prior rulings, based on opinions at a point in time doesn’t seem much different than anecdotes to me. But I’d love to be proven wrong though.