4 ms·
I agree 100% with you. could it write an introduction better than me or take an outline and create a paragraph that's better written then I could probably.
by sharemywin 4y ago
I agree 100% with you. could it write an introduction better than me or take an outline and create a paragraph that's better written then I could probably.
- mdp2021 4y ago> write [...] better than me Very hopefully not, because we suppose you would check the content before and after expression. Check it in terms of intelligence: in terms of relevance, of truth, of importance, of logic, of foundational solidity...
- sharemywin 4y agoI suck at writing. I've always hated it.
- mdp2021 4y agoWell, you are then more than just excused to use tools which help you in expressing yourself (contextually, "expressing the ideas that come from your own work") - as long, of course, as those tools do not make you even weaker. But if you have that weakness, we should warmly recommend that you read a bit more, a bit better - more "quality" texts read in "quality" time -, and that you spend more attention in the activity of your expression... There is no need to keep that weakness, if it is just a matter of underdevelopment. -- Back instead to the topic: "artificial deliriousness" cannot replace your intelligence (it has none), so there are no alternatives - an Intelligence duly has to check outputs...