This example has already been countered multiple times. You can not copyright a solid blue painting, you can only copyright an 'installation' of such. People in

This example has already been countered multiple times. You can not copyright a solid blue painting, you can only copyright an 'installation' of such. People in these discussions act as if copyright only came into being and hasn't been legislated/litigated for quite a while now. But then, these people can't even be bothered to look at copyright requirements that there be at the least an 'anonymous artist' that created the work to be copyrighted (and hint, a prompt writer does not count as such, anymore than a machinist inputting CAD requirements suddenly owns copyright to each factory part their machine spits out).