4 ms·
Wow. Just wow. As far as I'm concerned, the student in question should have exactly one response to the Stanford administration. "Fuck You."
by mindcrime 4y ago
Wow. Just wow. As far as I'm concerned, the student in question should have exactly one response to the Stanford administration.
"Fuck You."
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> the student in question should have exactly one response to the Stanford administration I would have assumed everyone would have rushed to check out copies of books this PIH deems harmful. More concretely, PIH is described as a "reporting system." Are Stanford's librarians violating their confidentiality duty? (EDIT: Never mind, it looks like a public-reporting system [1] to the let the campus rabbi get upset at what students are reading.) [1] https://stanforddaily.com/2023/01/22/protected-identity-harm-report-filed-as-screenshot-of-student-reading-mein-kampf-circulates/ https://stanforddaily.com/2023/01/22/protected-identity-harm...
- tablespoon 4y agoThis is apparently the website for their "Protected Identity Harm Reporting System," including a form to submit reports: https://protectedidentityharm.stanford.edu/ https://protectedidentityharm.stanford.edu/ That have a dashboard where they apparently made some of the reports public (but it doesn't look like it's automatically updated). This was was interesting: https://protectedidentityharm.stanford.edu/news/cords-potentially-representing-nooses-found-112921 https://protectedidentityharm.stanford.edu/news/cords-potent...: > What happened: > On the morning of Monday, November 29 a student reported seeing two long cords that may represent nooses in a tree near the intersection of Campus Drive and Junipero Serra Boulevard, along the Lake Lagunita walking trail. What is being done: > Updated as of 5/10/22 > Based on statements from staff and students, and photos showing the scene at Lake Lagunita, it was determined the cords in the tree had been in that location for several years prior to it being reported to DPS. Photos showed the cords in the tree dating back to at least June 2017. Separately, a former student reached out reporting their recollection that a rope swing used to be in that location. DPS closed the case on December 6, 2021, and the incident was not classified as a crime. > Updated as of 11/30/21 > A student reported the cords to the Dean of Students Office early this morning. The Office immediately contacted the Stanford University Department of Public Safety (DPS), which promptly investigated the incident with a campus arborist. Based on weathering and tree growth around the cords, it seems that the cords had been attached to the tree for approximately 18-24 months. We cannot be certain whether the ropes were deliberately fashioned in the shape of nooses, or were part of an abandoned swing or rope ladder. > The Dean of Students Office has connected with the student via telephone and email and will continue offering support.
- Overtonwindow 4y agoI've generally followed the belief that if an authority body says should not do something, I definitely want to know what that something is. This is continual additional blow back from the woke, hive mind virus.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> blow back from the woke, hive mind virus It's a childish rejection of authority. A spoiler instinct built into all of us which precedes "wokeness" by millennia. It usually manifests as children being snots and adults being insufferable. It's also entirely necessary for change, progress and revolution.
- PointA2B 4y agoYep. If no rules or laws were broken, you have no obligation to participate in their circus.