2 ms·
I’ve had pretty complex discussions about Buddhism, physics, and other subjects and it was generally erudite and accurate. In its current unrefined form it’s m
by fnordpiglet 4y ago
I’ve had pretty complex discussions about Buddhism, physics, and other subjects and it was generally erudite and accurate. In its current unrefined form it’s more useful than google is at providing understanding on most subjects, especially because it will attempt to answer my direct questions rather than providing documents with terms in them. In fact I think it’s probably one of the most useful tools I’ve ever used.
Has it given me wrong information? Absolutely. But it’s always been pretty obviously wrong, and I often use it to introduce me to a subject then follow up with google to verify details. I further fully expect this to improve.
- helloplanets 4y agoYes, I've been going back and forth between Google and ChatGPT quite a bit lately. Sort of using Google as the verification step, after getting deeper into a subject.
- fnordpiglet 4y agoFor the haters, it seems incredibly likely that an IR system like google will be augmenting LLM and semantic reasoning systems to form a solution to the problems folks point. The problems chatgpt suffer from are solved and are complementary.