You mean the artists who use similar brushes in photoshop and don’t know how to paint and musicians who use logic, auto tune, loop samples and don’t know how to

You mean the artists who use similar brushes in photoshop and don’t know how to paint and musicians who use logic, auto tune, loop samples and don’t know how to play an instrument? Copyright what? Someone’s brain? You can copyright a specific work or a character, but you actually want to live in a world where someone can copyright the color red with a dark black line, or the G# chord? Real artists are going to art, and musicians are going to make music. People who do creative work do it to express themselves, their point of view or to say something. Corporate art exist to sell you soda - I am not sure your argument lands quite like you want it to. I am glad this is going to court, because, with my understand of how neural nets work, I fail to see how any copyright is being infringed.