4 ms·
This is kind of an absurd example. The system is setup in such a way that such a person would be in enormous amounts of trouble even face criminal liability. Th
by dinkumthinkum 4y ago
This is kind of an absurd example. The system is setup in such a way that such a person would be in enormous amounts of trouble even face criminal liability. They may not face a law called “practicing medicine without a license” but they would face negligent or other similarly severe charges. As well, the fact that this never, ever happens seems to indicate the current regulatory structure is enough for this.
- lostlogin 4y agoThe US really doesn’t have the concept of ‘scope of practice’? That’s what’s being argued here and other systems have it. It seems an obvious thing.