6 ms·
If you don't have a source for that, you should put it back where it came from.
by puffoflogic 4y ago
If you don't have a source for that, you should put it back where it came from.
- paranoidxprod 4y agohttps://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2815 https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2815 5 months before the vaccine came out.
- AndrewUnmuted 4y ago[dead]
- Dawnyhf2 4y ago[dead]
- ortusdux 4y agoShouldn't your sentiment also apply to the parent comment as well?
- digdugdirk 4y agoWhile I do realize I'm wasting time feeding the trolls, here you go. Pretty easy to do a simple google scholar search for "Long Covid" and sort by date. https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3489 https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3489
- n42 4y ago“Controversial opinion with no evidence presented in just enough of a noncommittal way to deflect responsibility for its presentation. Watch me get downvoted, that’ll prove me right!” “Widely accepted take” “Your inability to provide evidence proves the original take!” This way of “arguing” has been carefully crafted to prevent any intellectual debate. Not that I think it will help you, here is an article in Nature on long Covid published in December of 2020 before vaccines were widely distributed: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-01177-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-01177-6