Ok, cool, I should have looked it up, but the sentence in the article was "Except for Qualcomm, which makes its own ARM-compatible cores, every other ARM chip o

Ok, cool, I should have looked it up, but the sentence in the article was "Except for Qualcomm, which makes its own ARM-compatible cores, every other ARM chip on the market uses reference CPU cores", which I didn't think was true (and I don't think 'compatible' is the right word for Qualcomm, probably 'extended' ?). Also, he talks about this future 22nm process from intel for 2013, as though the other fabs are going to sit at 28nm forever (even though Intel is also currently at 28nm). It just seems like a poorly written article, or someone who copied a little too much from Intel's PR.