The goalposts are still at "let people exist safely and comfortably outside a car and stop paying for your car use". Your repeated attempts to characterise this

The goalposts are still at "let people exist safely and comfortably outside a car and stop paying for your car use". Your repeated attempts to characterise this as something else don't change it. > Again you’re pretending the vast majority of people are somehow in areas where public transportation is viable. This is 100% absolutely false. Citation needed. Also "At least one safe sustainable transport option" isn't "transit only". Also it's amazing how quickly you went from "there's a bunch of reasons to reduce car dependence but you should dismiss this one" to a gish gallop of reactionary nonsense. Almost like it was a bad faith rhetorical technique to dismiss it.