5 ms·

> So many artists styles could have gone viral and actually bring those artists some work from the people who tried the AI commercially and got results that wer

> So many artists styles could have gone viral and actually bring those artists some work from the people who tried the AI commercially and got results that weren't completely satisfactory. I think it's quite presumptuous to unequivocally state that artists lose with this. Is it a complicated situation? Yes, of course, too complicated for such certainty. That's a wonderful thing to believe, but it's just as plausible (I'd argue far, far more plausible as the tech improves) that clients who would formerly pay for their work no longer have to.

scotty79 4y ago
It's absolute and total loss for every artist for nearly any artist that won't voluntarily opt-in. When you consider laws regarding organ donors you might appreciate how socially harmful might be wrong defaults.
scotty79 4y ago
> but it's just as plausible (I'd argue far, far more plausible as the tech improves) that clients who would formerly pay for their work no longer have to. With the volume of AI art generated was an even single actual case of that?