> do you not see that even if this has the color of law, it is in fact _wildly unjust_? It's not good, and it's certainly not ideal, but it's much worse for th

> do you not see that even if this has the color of law, it is in fact _wildly unjust_? It's not good, and it's certainly not ideal, but it's much worse for the courts to be usurping powers they don't have. > Given the FEC's extremely limited budget, the fact that they can only enforce a subset of violations is completely necessary. > This is true of all agencies, police organizations and the like. The FEC specifically gave exemptions selectively to certain organisations. Not 'they didn't have the resources to pursue this' but 'they said it was ok for Michael Moore to do this but not Citizens United'. > In their hearts, they think, "Our evil side will be able to win and win and win forever if we set the rules to 'Cheat Mode'". I'm so glad you're able to glimpse into my heart of hearts and determine what I think for myself.