>The problem is that ChatGPT makes up convincing sounding case law, reference court rules that either don't exist or don't say what the summary says, I look fo

>The problem is that ChatGPT makes up convincing sounding case law, reference court rules that either don't exist or don't say what the summary says, I look forward to it snarkily telling me that the CFAA was "wRiTtEn In BlOoD" and then post-hoc editing its comment with links it Googled up that have titles supporting its point and bodies that contradict. It feels like with a little more tuning so as not to be misleading this stuff is on the verge of being useful. In the meantime I'll get some popcorn and enjoy spectating the comment wars between chat(gpt)bots and the subset of HN commenters who formerly had a local monopoly on such behavior.