5 ms·
> until this portion. That is a hard no. Ok, I accept your argument as valid. There are sufficient funds that could be used for salaries. Let's imagine for a
by zmxz 4y ago
> until this portion. That is a hard no.
Ok, I accept your argument as valid. There are sufficient funds that could be used for salaries.
Let's imagine for a second you are hiring me. You have $40 in bank and I cost you $1 a year. In past 5 years, I never made you a single $. I just cost you $1 a year, with slight increases. You paid me $5 so far.
Would you keep paying me $1 a year or would you rather invest (the $5 you'd spend on me in next 5 years) into this new thing called AI, hoping you might get $10 out of it?
Purely looking at numbers, deciding objectively and without emotion - what seems the best for you?
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoIn the current state of AI? I guess it would depend heavily on the job at hand. My concerns with current iterations are privacy ( how do I know sensitive data ingested to feed the model won't be re-used ala co-pilot or gpt for other entities and some information should stay where it is ) and errors which necessitate human babysitting anyway. There is a clear benefit to automation ( in fact, its usually my spiel ), but it is going to happen anyway so I am not sure what the argument is in this instance. Would you be willing to elaborate?