Certainly ignorant, since you mentioned it. Read the synopsis. Then, read the paper. Then evaluate based on merits, not some (frankly unrelated) prior agenda ab

Certainly ignorant, since you mentioned it. Read the synopsis. Then, read the paper. Then evaluate based on merits, not some (frankly unrelated) prior agenda about copyright infringement. The title doesn't even really imply what you're suggesting. Quite a reach. At risk of breaking the rules, RTFM.