3 ms·
For what it's worth, the US has "section 230" that absolves services providers of liability for content their users post.
by madeofpalk 4y ago
For what it's worth, the US has "section 230" that absolves services providers of liability for content their users post.
- Georgelemental 4y agoSection 230 doesn't apply to CSAM, since SESTA/FOSTA
- kenmorechalfant 4y agoIf your software encrypts user data with a user owned key that you never touch, i.e. everything is encrypted at rest, can you still be liable if it's later proven to be CSAM?
- panarky 4y agoIf you have knowledge of CSAM or reasonably expect CSAM exists in the traffic you're forwarding, you have liability.
- Karunamon 4y agoNot much. While this may keep you out of jail, it will not prevent you from being raided at four in the morning and having your pets shot and all your computers seized for months.
- aliqot 4y agoWon't prevent your pipes and hosts from extorting or struggling you either.