3 ms·
--->8 ChatGPT: "Your honor, that couldn't have been me, as I drive a red Mustang, not a blue minivan, and was in Nepal climbing a mountain at the time.." Defe
by gwd 4y ago
--->8
ChatGPT: "Your honor, that couldn't have been me, as I drive a red Mustang, not a blue minivan, and was in Nepal climbing a mountain at the time.."
Defendant: "Your honor, that couldn't have been my, as I drive a red Mustang, not a blue minivan, and was in Nepal climbing a mountain at the time."
Prosecutor: "Um, this photo clearly shows your face in this blue minivan, and there's no evidence you've been to Nepal."
Judge: "I'm holding you in contempt of court, and sentence you to 7 days in jail for perjury."
8<----
I don't think the argument is that AI is never allowed to represent someone in court; just that before it happens, a sufficient amount of vetting must be done. At a bare minimum, the legal AI needs to know not to lead the defendant to perjure themselves.
- jeroenhd 4y agoI think the way forward might be an arbitration case, where they pay an actual legal expert in the right position to make binding decisions outside of the context of the normal law system. In voluntary arbitration, you can bend the rules a lot more than in an actual court case.
- sebzim4500 4y agoI would 100% lay the blame with the defendant in that instance though.