Perhaps the goalposts were always in the wrong place. AI researchers tend to use their own definitions of intelligence - playing chess/go, having conversations

Perhaps the goalposts were always in the wrong place. AI researchers tend to use their own definitions of intelligence - playing chess/go, having conversations about trivia that require no true emotional insight, "making" "art", writing code, driving. What if those are all peripheral side effects and not at all necessary to human AGI?