> That's just making up stuff, though. It's taking the next step in line with what all digital cameras already do. They all do post-processing and make approxi

> That's just making up stuff, though. It's taking the next step in line with what all digital cameras already do. They all do post-processing and make approximations to what the eye actually sees. Just because upscaling technology is still in its infancy and it's not entirely foolproof yet, is not an indication that it won't become seamless and undetectable in the future. I agree that such features should be optional and all processing should be clearly marked, but to dismiss the technology altogether is a mistake.