3 ms·
I gave up on ChatGPT for code generation because I ended up spending more time tweaking prompts/fixing outputs than if I had just written it myself in the first
by nmfisher 4y ago
I gave up on ChatGPT for code generation because I ended up spending more time tweaking prompts/fixing outputs than if I had just written it myself in the first place. I think this is probably the future of "coding" but it's not quite there yet.
Is CoPilot any better?
- danielbln 4y agoI've found it to be significantly better at code mutation and documentation.
- spacebanana7 4y agoThe UX of CoPilot is a lot better. It feels like a smarter version of autocomplete. They're based on the same GPT3 model so the quality of suggested code is similar but the ability to accept/reject suggestions based on tabbing in CoPilot makes it much less hassle to use.
- fisf 4y agoSame here. ChatGPT kept coming up with syntactically plausible Java code. However, it kept using library methods that plainly don't exist for specific fields.