3 ms·
I get your point. In that sense, your view on gatekeeping would be more like what happened to Huawei and how they were straight banned from the US market. It
by makeitdouble 4y ago
I get your point.
In that sense, your view on gatekeeping would be more like what happened to Huawei and how they were straight banned from the US market.
It sometimes happens, but few things are so black and white in politics and market regulations IMO. Killing the viability of an import route by pushing the tarrifs outside of the reasonable range is often enough and helps to avoid "smoking gun" headlines.
- ChuckMcM 4y agoAgreed, I would say Huawei was "gatekeeped" (not a word I know but banned without recourse)
- mtnGoat 4y agoI could go either way in this. Considering all Chinese entities must comply with their government no matter where they operate, the US was gate keeping the Chinese government from operating here. Not just some random company. And I’m ok with this, US citizens can not free hold corporations in China, why should we allow the reverse?