3 ms·
The epson consumer scanners are good. Really good. But they are nothing like drum scanners and other professional scanners.
by whitemary 4y ago
The epson consumer scanners are good. Really good. But they are nothing like drum scanners and other professional scanners.
- jojobas 4y agoAgain, how? Once you get to the grain there's no more information to extract.
- whitemary 4y agoWhat do you mean by “get”? I have an Epson V700. I have done plenty of side by side comparisons. The sharpness of the grain in the scan is what matters, not merely “getting” the grain. To speak of the resolution of a film exposure is incoherent. Grain != pixels. The V700 is also inconsistent because of the floppy plastic mounts and because they lack a mechanism to really keep the film flat.
- jojobas 4y agoIf you can see individual grains you are already limited by the film itself, anything beyond that is noise. Sharper grain is just a higher spatial frequency noise.
- chrstphrknwtn 4y agoIt sounds like you haven't done a lot of film scanning besides perhaps an Epson.
- s800 4y agoI have an Epson V800 and a Flextight, the output is much better on the flex tight. There's more to it than just the manufacturer's DPI flex.
- chrstphrknwtn 4y agoBecause Epson scanners don't actually resolve the grain. Low resolution scans tend to exaggerate grain... which can make you think you're resolving the grain. Also, photos aren't only about resolution and sharpness. Colour and tone reproduction is also important. And consumer scanners are acceptable, but nowhere near as good as drum scanners. Even minilab scanners (Fuji Frontier, Noritsu) are no match for drum scanners.