4 ms·
Probably like a lot of other hunter gatherer groups, worked with 10 numbers at most- what they could count on their fingers.
by kerpotgh 4y ago
Probably like a lot of other hunter gatherer groups, worked with 10 numbers at most- what they could count on their fingers.
- tom-thistime 4y agoI don't think they'd necessarily have a base-20 system built into the language if they didn't work with numbers larger than 10.
- pavlov 4y agoThere's another set of countables on feet, for a total of 20.
- Ancapistani 4y agoBase-20 works well on one hand. Using your thumb, start counting on the first bone in each finger. That gets you to four. Continue with the first joint (8), then the second bone (12), then the second joint (16) and finally the tips (20).
- Schiphol 4y agoAnd 32 with your fingers only, if you use each finger as a bit :)
- Turing_Machine 4y agoIf you use all 10, you can count up to 1024. :-)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- User23 4y ago31 really, because a fist is zero. Four also presents a minor difficulty.
- krsdcbl 4y agomakes me think of how to count with the base 60 babylonian number system. You'd use the thumb of one hand to count to 12 on the phalanges of the other 4 fingers, and keep track of every 5 passes like we would do with the second hand
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- downvotetruth 4y ago5 fingers have 14 segments. Using segments on both sides of both hands = 2 sides of 2 hands = 56 finger segment slots. Counting the palms and backs of both hands = 4 hand sides = 60 segment slots and hand sides. Along with the 14 joints on 4 sides = 56 joint nodes = 116 joint nodes, segment slots and hand sides. Including the 10 finger (tips) gets a total of 126 and two arms is 128. Palms, backs of hands, arms, etc. could be further subdivided. Exercise: determine count of combinations.
- hgsgm 4y agoI don't think Alaskans spend a lot of time looking at their toes. It's cold there.