5 ms·

Youtube ultimately took off at the start because of copyright infringement. To me, it is why they have an impenetrable moat now. The scale of copyright infring

Youtube ultimately took off at the start because of copyright infringement. To me, it is why they have an impenetrable moat now. The scale of copyright infringement needed to compete with youtube to spark a new fire is a non-starter because it is so intractable now compared to 15 years ago. A site to watch videos to intentionally make people angry sounds like some brilliant marketing. Could open up the algorithm and have settings for more anger, more pointlessness, more stupidity.

delitechlive 4y ago
>Youtube ultimately took off at the start because of copyright infringement. To me, it is why they have an impenetrable moat now. This is absolutely correct. I read somewhere this is what tech companies like Uber used as a strategy. Implement yourself regardless of the laws, and when the legal system catches up act in damage control. It's Blitzkrieg in a way. I recall several places in the world were taxi services were regulated, when Uber showed up with better services and low prices, they won over the consumers in a matter of weeks. It was game over for the old services. Napster did something similar but failed in the short run. If they had held off like Uber did and kept their ground everything would be very different as of today. But i think it was just too early.