2 ms·
For what it's worth, I think GP was being sarcastic.
by anamexis 4y ago
For what it's worth, I think GP was being sarcastic.
- logicallee 4y agoEDIT: apparently I was wrong and the poster was not sarcastic. (I thought it was Poe's law.)
- jahsome 4y agoThey replied the statement was not sarcastic and doubled down.
- morelisp 4y agoNobody would ever double-down on sarcasm.
- jonathankoren 4y agoAlways double down.:) Also, let’s be honest here. It’s stock valuation. That’s basically good vibes and rich VC money. It’s not like the money came from real people.
- burnished 4y agoNo, I think its a genuine case of two people with different values.
- phillipcarter 4y agoOh I'm not being sarcastic. The lemmings at the top of most tech companies are highly overpaid and continually fuck up Their One Job. The rare person who manages to trick them into paying a lot for little-to-no services has figured out the game and deserves some praise.
- hutzlibu 4y agoIn my idiotic idealistic opinion, people who build useful things, deserve praise.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]