> It’s not gatekeeping to value the outcomes of work created this way less than you would from the mind of a human. There is a difference between saying someth

> It’s not gatekeeping to value the outcomes of work created this way less than you would from the mind of a human. There is a difference between saying something is less than and calling it gross. Also, imho, value of art is usually the art not the process. Sometimes it is the process, like someone showing off a new method but that is of interest to very, very few people. Just like academic papers' methodology section. Even within the larger community, it's useful to only a few people. (Apart from just checking someone's work)