When I read this article, it remind me how english have a problem with the semantic of the word "free". When he says: "this photograph is not free" he means :

When I read this article, it remind me how english have a problem with the semantic of the word "free". When he says: "this photograph is not free" he means : "this photograph has a cost" when I understand: "this photograph has a licence witch does not allow people to share, copy, modify as wish" Librement