4 ms·
> I'm almost certain the way they technically define "biological age" is misleading I'd be curious how you came to that conclusion - considering that there's c
by generalizations 4y ago
> I'm almost certain the way they technically define "biological age" is misleading
I'd be curious how you came to that conclusion - considering that there's currently no known way to objectively measure biological age. Best thing that any researcher can do right now is just measure everything, and that's what they're doing.
- tablespoon 4y ago>> I'm almost certain the way they technically define "biological age" is misleading > I'd be curious how you came to that conclusion - considering that there's currently no known way to objectively measure biological age. Best thing that any researcher can do right now is just measure everything, and that's what they're doing. I came to that conclusion because, if they have a definition, they're almost certainly measuring things they can easily measure and perhaps influence, which aren't really the things people speak about when they talk about age. I don't care how fit this guy is, he's not living to 140 by doing the stuff he's doing.
- generalizations 4y agoYou can see for yourself the things that they're measuring: https://archive.is/TADr1#bryan-johnsons-blueprint https://archive.is/TADr1#bryan-johnsons-blueprint