4 ms·
>AI never does this. AI never does this now... We're probably one or two generational architecture changes from a system that can do it.
by htrp 4y ago
>AI never does this.
AI never does this now...
We're probably one or two generational architecture changes from a system that can do it.
- jqpabc123 4y agoYou do realize that people have been making predictions just like yours for decades? "Real" AI is perpetually just around the corner.
- pixl97 4y agoYou also realize that when AI accomplishes something we move the goalposts leading to the AI effect?
- TheOtherHobbes 4y agoPerhaps the goalposts were always in the wrong place. AI researchers tend to use their own definitions of intelligence - playing chess/go, having conversations about trivia that require no true emotional insight, "making" "art", writing code, driving. What if those are all peripheral side effects and not at all necessary to human AGI?
- tremon 4y agoThe goalposts were moved by marketing hype about a decade ago, when people started claiming that the then-new systems were "AI". Before that, the goalposts were always far away, at what we now call AGI because the term AI has been cheapened in order to sell stuff.
- dragonwriter 4y agoNo, AGI replaced AI for general intelligence before the current craze, AI was “cheapened” several AI hyoe cycles ago, for (among other things) rule-based expert systems. Which is why games have had “AI” long before the set of techniques at the center of the current AI hype cycle were developed.
- tremon 4y agoHeh, that's funny. I've seen the term "AI" used in many games for a computer opponent, but somehow I've never connected that use with the general term.
- josefx 4y agoCan you point at these proposed architectures? If they are just around the corner there should be decent enough papers and prototypes by now, right?