2 ms·
It’s not gatekeeping to value the outcomes of work created this way less than you would from the mind of a human. Saying that I agree with you in that I see th
by nemo44x 4y ago
It’s not gatekeeping to value the outcomes of work created this way less than you would from the mind of a human.
Saying that I agree with you in that I see this technology as a tool that can be used by humans to make amazing things. No one really has yet as the outputs have just been blunted, sloppy things. But if I’m an artist I see these tools as the latest tool to help make things.
- newswasboring 4y ago> It’s not gatekeeping to value the outcomes of work created this way less than you would from the mind of a human. There is a difference between saying something is less than and calling it gross. Also, imho, value of art is usually the art not the process. Sometimes it is the process, like someone showing off a new method but that is of interest to very, very few people. Just like academic papers' methodology section. Even within the larger community, it's useful to only a few people. (Apart from just checking someone's work)